1994-02-28 - Re: standard for stegonography?

Header Data

From: Jef Poskanzer <jef@ee.lbl.gov>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d3366a0df9e0e28035423e588bbbfbab4b975de32e2b4d53951306e47d507666
Message ID: <9402280205.AA06567@hot.ee.lbl.gov>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-28 02:05:29 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 27 Feb 94 18:05:29 PST

Raw message

From: Jef Poskanzer <jef@ee.lbl.gov>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 94 18:05:29 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: standard for stegonography?
Message-ID: <9402280205.AA06567@hot.ee.lbl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On reflection, it seems that some users will want an interoperable
standard, and other users will want complete stealth.  So what I'll
do is add a bunch of switches to pnmstego and pnmdestego, so that
the user can specify all sorts of different formats.  Letting the
switches default will get you a simple interoperable mode, so you
can send stuff to people without prior arrangement or put stuff on
an ftp server; but an attacker will be able to extract the bits and
try to decrypt them.  Specifying things like offsets and bit-usage
schedules will mean that the attacker won't even be able to extract
the bits; but the settings you use will be equivalent to that much
more key material that you have to communicate or remember.
---
Jef





Thread