1994-02-07 - Re: Some stuff about Diffie-Hellman (and more :-)

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: db469c7a027bdf97aa85b0087899efc14a7d34c3664a8d98b4840713ab754773
Message ID: <199402071810.NAA04869@snark>
Reply To: <9402071704.AA23562@ah.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-07 18:11:23 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 7 Feb 94 10:11:23 PST

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 94 10:11:23 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Some stuff about Diffie-Hellman (and more :-)
In-Reply-To: <9402071704.AA23562@ah.com>
Message-ID: <199402071810.NAA04869@snark>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Eric Hughes says:
> >Indeed, a paper has been published on how to break Sun Secure RPC
> >based on the idiotic decision by someone at Sun to standardise the
> >modulus used. 
> 
> It wasn't standardization that was the problem.  The Sun modulus was
> just too small.  My take on the idiocy was that the designers were
> assuming that because they didn't know how to break such a large
> modulus, that no one else did either.

Standardization was also a problem. It meant that the effort to break
one exchange could be used to break all of them at once. This seems
like a very bad thing.

Perry





Thread