cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1994-02-18 - Re: Detweiler blocking

Header Data

From: jdwilson@gold.chem.hawaii.edu (Jim Wilson (VA))
To: pmetzger@lehman.com
Message Hash: f0254207312af2002c43d5bb85c4dc5eb76f175c44bf560d9165b25b42bfd2a9
Message ID: <9402181723.AA28356@gold.chem.hawaii.edu>
Reply To: <9402170233.AA04512@andria.lehman.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-18 17:25:36 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 09:25:36 PST

Raw message

From: jdwilson@gold.chem.hawaii.edu (Jim Wilson (VA))
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 09:25:36 PST
To: pmetzger@lehman.com
Subject: Re: Detweiler blocking
In-Reply-To: <9402170233.AA04512@andria.lehman.com>
Message-ID: <9402181723.AA28356@gold.chem.hawaii.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


While I personally have no bitch with LD's posts (I just delete 99% of them)
it would seem that a service provider, like a restaurant, can say

  "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone"

It's a free country - (or at least buyable) - the remailer operators should
have a right to deny service to anyone they care to.  If the person they
deny service to doesn't like it, they can use a different remailer.  Or
start their own remailer.

Thread