1994-02-24 - RATINGS: Subject tags
Header Data
From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f06e18826fd7bcefc47fcfc7aa19cb79fb7788589b94a32aa805c4810cd89215
Message ID: <9402241838.AA21116@ah.com>
Reply To: <199402241752.JAA08805@netcom9.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-24 18:38:49 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 24 Feb 94 10:38:49 PST
Raw message
From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 94 10:38:49 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RATINGS: Subject tags
In-Reply-To: <199402241752.JAA08805@netcom9.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <9402241838.AA21116@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From my reading of the materials that Doug posted to the list, it
appears that strn uses materials which are mostly intrinsic to the
message base in order to rate articles. Those ratings which are
shared seem to be binary in nature, simply to include articles in
virtual lists of articles.
The 'strn' package described might be a good place to start for a user
agent, but it seems not to have the social goals that the ratings
proposal I have in mind does.
Eric
Thread
Return to February 1994
- Return to “doug@netcom.com (Doug Merritt)”
- Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
Return to ““Mark W. Eichin” <eichin@paycheck.cygnus.com>”
- 1994-02-24 (Thu, 24 Feb 94 09:52:11 PST) - Re: RATINGS: Subject tags - doug@netcom.com (Doug Merritt)
- 1994-02-24 (Thu, 24 Feb 94 10:38:49 PST) - RATINGS: Subject tags - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
- 1994-02-25 (Thu, 24 Feb 94 21:01:07 PST) - RATINGS: strn has the right features (was Subject tags) - “Mark W. Eichin” <eichin@paycheck.cygnus.com>
- 1994-02-24 (Thu, 24 Feb 94 10:38:49 PST) - RATINGS: Subject tags - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)