From: jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f1a668ac1e7dac76682e54dd4763cc11ae46a5222e1963acef3d085e93d26b02
Message ID: <9402032330.AA18898@bilbo.suite.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-03 23:39:44 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 3 Feb 94 15:39:44 PST
From: jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 94 15:39:44 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: SASE Suggestion
Message-ID: <9402032330.AA18898@bilbo.suite.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Lance Cottrell writes:
> One SASE scheme recently suggested involved sending a
> request for a SASE to a ramailer, stating the number of
> jumps required. It then sent it to another remailer, and
> so on. Each adding a layer, and eventually sending the
> results to the desired correspondent. I mentioned that
> if the first remailer was corrupted, that the whole chain
> was (it would only send to other corrupt remailers).
>
Oh, I see. I was confused as to which scheme you were talking about. You
were refering (I think) to the "prepaid mailer" idea Tim May described in
his "Re: Anonymous Anonymous ftp" post of Jan 27.
Jim_Miller@suite.com
Return to February 1994
Return to “jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)”
1994-02-03 (Thu, 3 Feb 94 15:39:44 PST) - Re: SASE Suggestion - jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)