1994-02-22 - Re: ratings

Header Data

From: nobody@rosebud.ee.uh.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f61b9d32490671953d3ecc57c66dc66a43900aecaa0cdd7a601fcd5d2dd8c49b
Message ID: <9402222202.AA29995@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-22 22:02:10 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 22 Feb 94 14:02:10 PST

Raw message

From: nobody@rosebud.ee.uh.edu
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 94 14:02:10 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: ratings
Message-ID: <9402222202.AA29995@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Robert Hayden said:
>Forgive my ignorance, but isn't this a lot of overkill?  I mean, one
>could simply set up a filter for subjects/people you don't want to see
>or press the 'D' key.

Well, a rating system like the one I think Eric is talking about would
disassociate "people" (the authors) from their post... so for example
in the future when everybody is using anonymous remailing services to
participate here and elsewhere, you would be able to read messages
from "people" (pseudonyms on digitally signed posts).  Of course, the
anonymous remailing services would prevent you from figuring out the
true author, so you can't filter for people in the manner you
describe.

Then you could pay attention to mail from Pr0duct Cipher and Deadbeat,
who have kept their identities secret, but filter out other
"anonymous" messages.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLWp/s4OA7OpLWtYzAQEaowP9FVOSEFtOR2WNV4a5cjleR06BRTBB2eZd
HB7cPwsiOzReufDJz9/i1PMeFBzd548DtC8AnyIriAY/c8zDAuK3ujMDgWM0FQ2+
W8khShw19GrFg0gsnuozHjorrivXw9OZzK3wOQQL5xx1BvWZ8kehM+YMjjKaq0vh
6Sjlt0RzKmM=
=IWy1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread