1994-02-03 - Re: digital signatures/copyright

Header Data

From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)
To: talon57@well.sf.ca.us
Message Hash: ffcb15a48243367a4012239c5eeed46a8f090067b14ec6e0cecd894b0f364d39
Message ID: <9402030239.AA03921@anchor.ho.att.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-03 02:41:04 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 2 Feb 94 18:41:04 PST

Raw message

From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 94 18:41:04 PST
To: talon57@well.sf.ca.us
Subject: Re:  digital signatures/copyright
Message-ID: <9402030239.AA03921@anchor.ho.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Brian Williams asks:
>  Could one make a case that the use of Digital signatures in
>  messages imply's copyright retention by the author?

No - you can make a case that the author doesn't want his words to be 
forged or tampered with, and is using technology rather than law to enforce it.

Doesn't affect the rest of the legal situation, though one could
try to argue either that the author was or was not expecting copyright.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3z

iQCVAgUBLU/2HdCcBnAsu2t1AQF15gP+IqS3o0gNeHng9BSqlk95KzmPwp3oo70p
j2FVYHNOeUKgDSAAwvWr+p3/DOwTafSkJf4A5gW33NOKr0E9JZ4In349RAoueTku
J94VMajT4i7yhOC8X41RPkVLlCltPDRo04SS8h5UFnEk/zFxiTkvXY9mpBcK3yUw
vYY9pbmupSc=
=KbXS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



		Bill





Thread