1994-03-29 - Re: cfp ‘94 transcript
Header Data
From: Jack King <gjk@well.sf.ca.us>
To: sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu
Message Hash: 1390e1615ce80542243431a61db90297e9894b31b09678bc7e7f8b482bcf2695
Message ID: <199403290127.RAA28080@well.sf.ca.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-29 01:30:12 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 28 Mar 94 17:30:12 PST
Raw message
From: Jack King <gjk@well.sf.ca.us>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 94 17:30:12 PST
To: sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu
Subject: Re: cfp '94 transcript
Message-ID: <199403290127.RAA28080@well.sf.ca.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Also note that the Fifth Circuit recently discarded the "exculpatory no"
defense to Sec. 1001. See _United States v. Rodriguez-Rios_, No. 92-
8257 (5th Cir. 2/11/94) (Smith, J.). Reported at 54 CrimLRptr 1528.
Now, in the Fifth Circuit, you can't even say "No, I never did/say/thought
that" without committing a crime!
Thread
Return to March 1994
- Return to “Jack King <gjk@well.sf.ca.us>”
Return to “Senator Bedfellow <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>”
- 1994-03-29 (Mon, 28 Mar 94 17:30:12 PST) - Re: cfp ‘94 transcript - Jack King <gjk@well.sf.ca.us>
- 1994-03-29 (Mon, 28 Mar 94 18:23:11 PST) - Re: cfp ‘94 transcript - Senator Bedfellow <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>