1994-03-11 - Re: The Coming Police State

Header Data

From: smb@research.att.com
To: “Mark W. Eichin” <eichin@paycheck.cygnus.com>
Message Hash: 16236132240d51698434663ffc40f01168175b59b5a260fc97060cb01521092c
Message ID: <9403111627.AA19317@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-11 16:27:45 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 11 Mar 94 08:27:45 PST

Raw message

From: smb@research.att.com
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 94 08:27:45 PST
To: "Mark W. Eichin" <eichin@paycheck.cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: The Coming Police State
Message-ID: <9403111627.AA19317@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


	 
	 <tcmay> writes:
	 >> prepared me for my later role as a hunted CyberFelon. ("Shockwave" 
	is
	 >> also credited by many to be one of the first mentions of "worms" in
	 >> computers....though Brunner may've been talking to folks at Xerox
	 >> PARC...wormly cross-fertilization.)

	 and I digress wildly:

	 Mid-November, 1988, after the great Morris Worm Stomp[1], a bunch of
	 people who'd helped hunt the Worm were invited to the NCSC[2] to give
	 talks at a "Post-Mortem", as it were. The MIT and Berkeley crowds had
	 the most real technical data on it[3], though at least one of the
	 government labs had done a fair job at decompiling it.

	 The relevant part was that while the NCSC didn't have much useful info
	 on the Worm itself[4] they had *categorized* it, and among their
	 spiffy color slides, they had a "taxonomy" slide which surprised me by
	 including Brunner's worm. The NCSC seems to officially credit Brunner
	 as the first literature reference to the idea...

Personally, I give the credit to David Gerrold, in ``When Harlie Was One''.
Here's a netnews posting of mine that explains my reasoning.






Thread