1994-03-23 - A possibility…

Header Data

From: Ophir Ronen (Rho) <a-ophirr@microsoft.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2ce44d0674c680106ae78c2d2332405ff2445ab86efd65db17c69d5006ba9788
Message ID: <9403232005.AA26190@netmail2.microsoft.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-23 20:04:46 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 23 Mar 94 12:04:46 PST

Raw message

From: Ophir Ronen (Rho) <a-ophirr@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 94 12:04:46 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: A possibility...
Message-ID: <9403232005.AA26190@netmail2.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hello All,

I have an idea that may or may not be feasible so I am offering it for
scrutiny.

What I am thinking is to have one person encrypt using a RNG (noise). He
encrypts his message using the noise on one channel and then copies the noise
utilized on another channel. He then mixes the two channels to 
create....noise.
On the other side the person must be expecting the noise and must know how to
seperate the signal. It seems that this leaves things open by having the
encryption key along with the message, but the message itself is just noise.
(i.e. the interloper must know of the signal, and know how to split it into
it's two components.)

				Comments?

					-Ophir


*******************************************************************
Ophir Ronen <a-ophirr@microsoft.com>
key id:E67065
print =  66 57 94 27 D9 70 C5 B4  95 31 F6 41 FD 5C EB 1A
*******************************************************************
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLZCfXNhDgNPk5nBlAQHYwAP+LtV07arvUwpdkTtmSQcm8WAk9E+7LX4F
I4ILQfuOt9fnIoFOgMr2QX1gbRmYR1+PgKeuzMV8QEmdxXb/tJdF4Gven4OCmRUR
XRIln4Eau0uuxbjmPkI+gVcdgbML1LKb6I4ExCsIQOZhVoYcO1PJWugxxiIaRkDd
QiBwuZ0yQTk=
=4r3N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread