1994-03-05 - Re: Update on user-level hack to do telnet encryption posted recently

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
To: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Message Hash: 2d9797646d00f786589d6696977cda457397199f1a16bcd5fa61f3f8e8e8bcdd
Message ID: <9403052010.AA10820@andria.lehman.com>
Reply To: <199403051903.TAA24567@an-teallach.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-05 20:12:11 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 5 Mar 94 12:12:11 PST

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 94 12:12:11 PST
To: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Subject: Re: Update on user-level hack to do telnet encryption posted recently
In-Reply-To: <199403051903.TAA24567@an-teallach.com>
Message-ID: <9403052010.AA10820@andria.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Graham Toal says:
> OK folks, I've started tidying up that hack code I posted recently which
> outlined a method for rolling your own telnet-style encryption.

I really think this project is a serious mistake. People should, if
they insist, produce software compatible with the draft RFCs on telnet
encryption and authentication -- although such code has already been
written. The notion of putting in all this effort just to avoid having
to deal with your system administrator, especially when he should be
happy to install such code given the recent rash of internet breakins,
seems misplaced to me.

Perry 






Thread