From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 37c3e85c917ff6de9c75ecb99d5a80c3a7309bf0f140058f5b85d3a5c2c7cf55
Message ID: <199403031222.AA10439@access3.digex.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-03 12:22:21 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 3 Mar 94 04:22:21 PST
From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 94 04:22:21 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: MacPGP a plant?
Message-ID: <199403031222.AA10439@access3.digex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Now I'm sure I'm jumping to conclusions, but consider the following:
1> The MacPGP2.3 source is, as near as I can tell, unreleased and
unavailable.
2> The output from MacPGP2.3 is easily distinguishable from MSDOS
output.
(MacPGP headers all messages with "Version 2.3" and not "Version 2.3a")
3> The signature file intended to show the applications is
intact from the author is not included with the compressed application
on any of the sites I have seen MacPGP2.3 on.
The implications are left as an exercise for the reader.
MacPGP2.3 has been in release for some time now, yet no one
has commented (that I have seen) on the absence of a signature
file or detached signature with the release.
Is this because I just can't find the signature, or is there no
signature available?
-uni- (Dark)
Return to March 1994
Return to “Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>”
1994-03-03 (Thu, 3 Mar 94 04:22:21 PST) - MacPGP a plant? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>