From: lstanton@lehman.com (Linn Stanton)
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 94 13:45:26 PST
To: consensus@netcom.com
Subject: Re: RIPEM 1.2
In-Reply-To: <9403162105.AA11834@apple.com>
Message-ID: <9403162145.AA22546@sten.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>>>>> "Christopher" == Christopher Allen <consensus@netcom.com> writes:

    Christopher> Now that there is a new version of RIPEM available,
    Christopher> what do you think of it? What do you think is the
    Christopher> value in using it over PGP?

I am glad to see that the 'web of trust' model is spreading. However,
I still see no reason to use ripem.

1) ripem is illegal for non-north-american users
2) ripem still uses DES
3) using ripem supports the notion that PKP holds some valid patents


Linn H. Stanton <stanton@acm.org>

The above opinions are exclusively my own. If anyone else wants them,
they can buy them from me. Easy terms can be arranged.
- -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.2
 
mQBNAitK8+EAAAECALzK83DH79m7DLKBmZA2h9U33fBE80EwT4xRY05K7WRfxpO3
BmhPVBmes9h97odVZ0RxAFvinOl4wZGOb8pDclMABRG0IUxpbm4gSC4gU3RhbnRv
biA8c3RhbnRvbkBhY20ub3JnPrQnTGlubiBILiBTdGFudG9uIDxsc3RhbnRvbkBz
aGVhcnNvbi5jb20+
=oCru
- -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQBVAgUBLYd958GRjm/KQ3JTAQGZHgH/X5f3EuTOelU+yhy6rPbTNK+97JOEsETP
MFw9KVf6NLc76nHKxToYla+WNY0em+m5jUKiEPhAj0o6KgP9HZplWA==
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----