1994-03-21 - Note from EDUPAGE

Header Data

From: “Alan (Miburi-san) Wexelblat” <wex@media.mit.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3e85febef28a460f0999552ae337cf11d4b629a5b1170f40c3fbb4cf1e7ba735
Message ID: <9403211705.AA29714@media.mit.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-21 17:05:20 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 21 Mar 94 09:05:20 PST

Raw message

From: "Alan (Miburi-san) Wexelblat" <wex@media.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 94 09:05:20 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Note from EDUPAGE
Message-ID: <9403211705.AA29714@media.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



CALL FORWARD FOR CRIME
Criminals have discovered that by forwarding their calls, they can evade
wiretaps placed on their home lines. "Criminals can go to any phone, call
the `intelligent network' and route calls anywhere," says an FBI special
agent. The FBI estimates that 25% of all wiretaps "are adversely affected"
by this telephone hide-and-seek. (Wall Street Journal 3/18/94 A5A)

[Wex notes: this seems relevant to the ongoing fight over the FBI wiretap
proposal; I wonder if they're laying the public groundwork for supporing
their proposal to get call-setup information.  I also wonder if it would do
them a damn bit of good.  If I call a number which I know has previously
been forwarded to a different number, is the eventual target # part of the
call-setup info?]






Thread