1994-03-31 - Re: crypto software/papers/docs CD – is there any interest?

Header Data

From: GERSTEIN@SCSUD.CTSTATEU.EDU
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 48d4e05bceda8852d04c66c46780cfdcd693c7abec0220493d891df5ad9c6861
Message ID: <940331104326.2020825a@SCSUD.CTSTATEU.EDU>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-31 15:41:31 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 31 Mar 94 07:41:31 PST

Raw message

From: GERSTEIN@SCSUD.CTSTATEU.EDU
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 94 07:41:31 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: crypto software/papers/docs CD -- is there any interest?
Message-ID: <940331104326.2020825a@SCSUD.CTSTATEU.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Tim May writes:
>Mark Henderson writes:
>
>> Forgive the somewhat commercial nature of this message, but I think 
>> it is well within the lines of the cypherpunks mission of getting 
>> code out to people. 
>>
>> I'm considering the possibility of producing a CD (for distribution 
>> in North America only) of crypto source code, information/papers and 
>> binaries for common platforms.
>>...[BUNCH OF STUFF DELETED]......
>
>You'll have to be real careful here, as charging money means
>copyrights have to be more scrupulously watched than when sites just
>"informally" contain copyrighted material. (I'm not arguing for these
>laws, just noting them.)
...[ANOTHER BUNCH OF STUFF DELETED]......
>(There are lots of issues here, which get debated over and over again
>in various forums. All I'm saying is that charging $50 for a
>compilation of articles, FAQs, scanned items, etc. is likely to
>trigger a lot of things. Just a heads up.)
>
...[STILL MORE DELETED]......
>--Tim May
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

	Wouldn't doing something like this be like distributing shareware on a 
CD-Rom? Most of the Rom's I've seen have programs and the like, but a few have 
had source code, papers, hypercard stacks, etc. that were all copyrighted but 
still pushed out on the Rom.

	I think the only problem would be if you were charging more money than 
a "reasonable duplication fee". Most people will agree that this would be the 
cost of the media and maybe a little something for your time.

	Just another of my 0.02...

		Adam Gerstein

"After this, nothing will shock me."
----------
"In a Time/CNN poll of 1,000 Americans conducted last week by Yankelovich
Partners, two-thirds said it was more important to protect the privacy of phone
calls than to preserve the ability of police to conduct wiretaps.
When informed about the Clipper Chip, 80% said they opposed it."
- Philip Elmer-Dewitt, "Who Should Keep the Keys", TIME, Mar. 4, 1994
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
To sign on to the letter, send a message to:
	Clipper.petition@cpsr.org

with the message "I oppose Clipper" (no quotes). You will receive a return 
message confirming your vote.







Thread