1994-03-01 - Re: standard for stefonography?

Header Data

From: jdblair@nextsrv.cas.muohio.EDU
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List )
Message Hash: 4c725c598bde387acbc302af9df7156e7263eb84fb3200a11cad230a4515e0d3
Message ID: <9403010537.AA08539@ nextsrv.cas.muohio.EDU >
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-01 05:39:28 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 28 Feb 94 21:39:28 PST

Raw message

From: jdblair@nextsrv.cas.muohio.EDU
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 94 21:39:28 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List )
Subject: Re: standard for stefonography?
Message-ID: <9403010537.AA08539@ nextsrv.cas.muohio.EDU >
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Correct me if I'm wrong, but the "Standard Stego" package that has been 
discussed could operate like the "stealth ocean" ideas that have been 
discussed.  Some sort of hash function defines "random-like" bits to be 
accessed in a consecutive form.  These bits can be located in a hard 
drive full of digitized noise, a jpeg or gif file, a CD, or any other 
large chunk of data.  The access mechanism can be standardized.  Without 
the key string, you don't know which bits are random and which are data.

-john.




Thread