From: rustman@netcom.com (Rusty H. Hodge)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4e39a09913251070dba58d521ada20c4b8bf76c9a0c2be75432191ccef979867
Message ID: <199403130955.BAA01864@netcom8.netcom.com>
Reply To: <199403101607.IAA00526@soda.berkeley.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-13 09:54:56 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 13 Mar 94 01:54:56 PST
From: rustman@netcom.com (Rusty H. Hodge)
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 94 01:54:56 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Locating Color Copiers
In-Reply-To: <199403101607.IAA00526@soda.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <199403130955.BAA01864@netcom8.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
nobody@soda.berkeley.edu says...
>
> On a slightly related topic, I know of an instance where the
> Secret Service located a stolen color copier with somewhat
> greater speed than one might have expected.
>
> Is it possible that these machines either:
> (1) contain transponders
> or
> (2) hide a "signature" in their output ???
1. Why was the secret service looing for stolen property?
2. This is an urban legend. There is no "signature" on the output of
Canon CLC copiers.
because these copiers are so maintenance-intensive, and since Canon
*owns* most of the CLC dealers, it would be very easy for them to check
their s/n records when they are servicing the equipment (which needs to
be done when the devices are moved)!
pretty exciting, huh?
--
Rusty H. Hodge, Cyberneticist <rustman@netcom.com>
Return to March 1994
Return to “rustman@netcom.com (Rusty H. Hodge)”