From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 52d52a75cee582a9b95cd760b5b8bb07e18117ad4b66dd7145fe78584037f9a8
Message ID: <9403022248.AA01608@internal.apple.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-02 22:49:14 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 2 Mar 94 14:49:14 PST
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 94 14:49:14 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Insecurity of public key crypto #1 (reply to Mandl)
Message-ID: <9403022248.AA01608@internal.apple.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Eric Johnson writes:
>
> I was suggesting just the opposite. It obviously isn't a security
> issue. I believe it is more of a first principles issue; "Thou
> shall encrypt thy communications, lest thou draw attention to thy
> self, and the right be removed by thine opponents."
Am I missing something, or is this equivalent to saying that the way to
oppose gun control is by brandishing a gun as much as possible?
--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
Return to March 1994
Return to “lefty@apple.com (Lefty)”
1994-03-02 (Wed, 2 Mar 94 14:49:14 PST) - Re: Insecurity of public key crypto #1 (reply to Mandl) - lefty@apple.com (Lefty)