1994-03-29 - Re: Very funny, Polyanna :-( [namespace pollution]

Header Data

From: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
To: gtoal@an-teallach.com
Message Hash: 7d941714bf436f1f40ac66b2b860a18e4b35513ec27fac843758b7beb6a9de9d
Message ID: <199403291620.IAA27281@servo.qualcomm.com>
Reply To: <199403281958.UAA26598@an-teallach.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-29 16:21:45 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 29 Mar 94 08:21:45 PST

Raw message

From: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 94 08:21:45 PST
To: gtoal@an-teallach.com
Subject: Re: Very funny, Polyanna :-( [namespace pollution]
In-Reply-To: <199403281958.UAA26598@an-teallach.com>
Message-ID: <199403291620.IAA27281@servo.qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Isn't this really just a special case of the more general problem of
deciding which keys on a public key ring you're willing to trust?
Perhaps your mailer script should automatically encrypt only when a
keyid is found with a signature trail that you trust.

I do see a signature for that key from Miron Cuperman. Perhaps
you'd want to modify your trust parameters for him...

Phil

Thread

• Return to March 1994

• Return to “gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)”
• Return to “Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>”

• Return to “Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>”

• 1994-03-28 (Mon, 28 Mar 94 11:58:59 PST) - Very funny, Polyanna :-( [namespace pollution] - gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
  • 1994-03-28 (Mon, 28 Mar 94 13:42:38 PST) - Re: Very funny, Polyanna :-( [namespace pollution] - Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>
  • 1994-03-29 (Tue, 29 Mar 94 08:21:45 PST) - Re: Very funny, Polyanna :-( [namespace pollution] - Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>