From: Carl Ellison <cme@sw.stratus.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 83da2f100a4805f7e961c133718dcc8ee482773c635395b4bdf6774fc55ee210
Message ID: <199403172019.PAA18362@galt.sw.stratus.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-17 20:19:28 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Mar 94 12:19:28 PST
From: Carl Ellison <cme@sw.stratus.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 94 12:19:28 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: my letter to Newsweek
Message-ID: <199403172019.PAA18362@galt.sw.stratus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
(with practice, I get more succinct. With luck I'll get a lot more
practice at this! :-) Have y'all written, too?
- Carl
>TO: Letters Editor, Newsweek
>FAX: (212) 350-4120
>
>SUBJECT: Mar 14, 94; p. 38; "Keeping the Cybercops Out of Cyberspace"
>
>Dear Editor:
>
>I consider myself a pragmatic critic and yet I propose scrapping any "key
>escrow" system, Clipper included. It is too insecure, not just because of
>government misconduct (although I am old enough to remember the Nixon
>administration) but because it opens discovery of encryption keys up to
>plain vanilla criminals.
>
>By creating a database of master keys (no matter how many pieces they are
>in), what has previously required the mathematical genius and computer
>budget of the NSA to crack is laid wide open to people whose only skills
>are in bribery, breaking and entering, impersonation, coercion, ..., namely
>those skills in which organized crime is presumably more expert than even
>the CIA.
>
>Meanwhile, the talk about wiretap court orders is misleading. Encryption
>will be needed by civilians in vast quantities not for wire communications
>but for wireless (and cellular) communications for which no one needs a
>court order to eavesdrop without fear of being detected.
>
>Thank you for your article and for considering these additional points.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Carl M. Ellison
Return to March 1994
Return to “Carl Ellison <cme@sw.stratus.com>”
1994-03-17 (Thu, 17 Mar 94 12:19:28 PST) - my letter to Newsweek - Carl Ellison <cme@sw.stratus.com>