1994-03-03 - Re: standard for stegonography?

Header Data

From: Sergey Goldgaber <sergey@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
To: Jef Poskanzer <jef@ee.lbl.gov>
Message Hash: 875e951a9d51d8f27e4beffa1d4fd018a08cf95c1a90362681ae5b7f613c3a34
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9403031226.A22438-0100000@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-03 17:36:21 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 3 Mar 94 09:36:21 PST

Raw message

From: Sergey Goldgaber <sergey@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 94 09:36:21 PST
To: Jef Poskanzer <jef@ee.lbl.gov>
Subject: Re: standard for stegonography?
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9403031226.A22438-0100000@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


  On Tue, 01 Mar 94, you wrote:
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  
> Then that generator is used to make a *permutation*
> of the bit locations in the image, and the file's bits are stored in
> the permuted order.

Will this be reversible?  Will a plain-text header be neccessary for the
intended recipient to how to reverse the function?

> I'm not going to have ITAR problems with this, am I?  RNGs are still
> legal to export?

Haven't you heard?  Everything mathematical is under restriction now!

;)

Sergey






Thread