From: dmandl@panix.com (David Mandl)
To: jmueller@gac.edu (Joel T Mueller)
Message Hash: 90763077535d87cfa097929aacc363a12f711e5e84901732b6e331363b0bb572
Message ID: <199403070221.AA19552@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-07 02:21:43 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 6 Mar 94 18:21:43 PST
From: dmandl@panix.com (David Mandl)
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 94 18:21:43 PST
To: jmueller@gac.edu (Joel T Mueller)
Subject: Re: PGP (surprise, surprise..)
Message-ID: <199403070221.AA19552@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
jmueller@gac.edu says:
>Greetings,
>
> Could anyone tell me, is it true that PGP 2.3 was watered down to
>appease the RSA folks? If so, would it be a better idea to use 2.2? Thanks.
Completely untrue. I can assure you that RSA was no more appeased by 2.3
than by 2.2, though there is now of course a truly legal version in
ViaCrypt PGP. Source code for the guerilla-ware versions is as always
available for your inspection, and you're free to compile it yourself. You
should use the latest one, period (I believe it's currently 2.3a for MS-DOS
and UNIX; MacPGP is 2.3).
--Dave.
--
Dave Mandl
dmandl@panix.com
Return to March 1994
Return to “dmandl@panix.com (David Mandl)”
1994-03-07 (Sun, 6 Mar 94 18:21:43 PST) - Re: PGP (surprise, surprise..) - dmandl@panix.com (David Mandl)