From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 977cdf343aeb6c77130653ab5767b340965233efe2f2a825532b42dca3787a2c
Message ID: <9403172236.AA16594@netmail2.microsoft.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-17 22:35:27 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Mar 94 14:35:27 PST
From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 94 14:35:27 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RE: Whats so bad about a surveillance state
Message-ID: <9403172236.AA16594@netmail2.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: Brian D Williams :
Blanc Weber Postulates:
> -With the rise of fiber telcos are laying fewer cable
> routes and just stuffing the routes they do dig up with
> more fiber than is necessary for replacement of the
> existing copper, leaving some major areas with only a
> single path in and out as one bundle of fiber replaces
> tons of copper that was laid in multiple paths
> originally becayse it would not fit in one path. Saves
> the telcos money, but a single backhoe might be able to
> cause some major damage now...
Well, I can't speak for the other Telco's, but here in the
Midwest this is flat out untrue.
....................................
Well, I can't say if that's true in the Midwest or anywhere else on the
planet, because I didn't write that paragraph, as I don't know a thing
about cables of any type or kind.
:>)
Blanc
Return to March 1994
Return to “Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>”
1994-03-17 (Thu, 17 Mar 94 14:35:27 PST) - RE: Whats so bad about a surveillance state - Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>