From: Ed Switalski <E.Switalski@bnr.co.uk>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9a5382a62795b901eece90186cca6d04ca616e2d39034b2126c65789d3fdb788
Message ID: <199403171231.6193@bnsgs200.bnr.co.uk>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-17 12:32:29 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Mar 94 04:32:29 PST
From: Ed Switalski <E.Switalski@bnr.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 94 04:32:29 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <199403171231.6193@bnsgs200.bnr.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
------- Forwarded Message
Return-Path: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Received: from hedera.bnr.co.uk on bnsgs200.bnr.co.uk over SMTP
(5.65c/UK-2.1-MX(adur)); Thu, 17 Mar 1994 09:37:18 GMT
Received: from eurogate.bnr.co.uk by hedera.bnr.co.uk with SMTP (PP);
Thu, 17 Mar 1994 09:37:14 +0000
Received: from relay2.UU.NET by eurogate.bnr.co.uk with Internet SMTP (PP)
id <25474-0@eurogate.bnr.co.uk>; Thu, 17 Mar 1994 09:37:08 +0000
Received: from toad.com by relay2.UU.NET
with SMTP (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AAwhpd03977;
Thu, 17 Mar 94 04:28:59 -0500
Received: by toad.com id AA08739; Thu, 17 Mar 94 01:16:04 PST
Received: from eurogate.bnr.co.uk by toad.com id AA08728;
Thu, 17 Mar 94 01:15:46 PST
Received: from bnr.co.uk by eurogate.bnr.co.uk with SMTP (PP)
id <25199-0@eurogate.bnr.co.uk>; Thu, 17 Mar 1994 09:15:20 +0000
Received: from bnsgs200.bnr.co.uk by hedera.bnr.co.uk with SMTP (PP);
Thu, 17 Mar 1994 09:15:11 +0000
Message-Id: <199403170915.5154@bnsgs200.bnr.co.uk>
Received: from bnsgs207.bnr.co.uk on bnsgs200.bnr.co.uk over SMTP (5.65c/UK-2.1-MX(adur));
Thu, 17 Mar 1994 09:15:06 GMT
To: Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Radio Networking
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 16 Mar 1994 21:12:00 EST." <YhVvlky00awO45VkcL@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 1994 09:14:32 +0000
From: Ed Switalski <E.Switalski@bnr.co.uk>
Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Precedence: bulk
>About how far can one transmit with 250mw?
*** Quite Far !
With coherent CW you can key morse Japan/US i.e cross the Pacific
on a few watts.
CCW involves getting the Tx master oscillator and the receivers
local oscillator phase-locked (by using the local time/frequency
standard transmitter (e.g. WWV MSF etc -one can also get nifty little
rubidium standard clocks quite cheaply these days).
US readers might care to look in the ARRL handbook for 1982 or thereabouts.
CCW implies slow signalling speeds- a few baud, very narrow detection
bandwidth few hertz (to match signalling) and coherent TX and RX.
The ultimate limit is probably phase shift in the ionosphere.
Use a frequency that a bit off Big Brother's scanner channel
spacing and your emmission may not be detected -unless the spook
is right on top of you. Which is just as well given it might
take DAYS to download a .ps document ;-(
Note this is a slow and gentle way of doing things, as opposed
to a high-bandwidth, time-compressed (fairlyly high-power) "screech"
transmission with somthing like meteorscatter.
Regards,
__o __o
Ed \<, \<,
_________________________________________()/ ()_____()/ ()_____________
Ed Switalski email: eswitals@bnr.co.uk
Dept GM21,
BNR Europe Ltd, Oakleigh Rd South, tel: +44 (0)81 945-2924
New Southgate, fax: +44 (0)81 945-3116
London, N11 1HB
LON40, internal ESN (730) 2924
_______________________________________________________________________
------- End of Forwarded Message
Return to March 1994
Return to “Ed Switalski <E.Switalski@bnr.co.uk>”
1994-03-17 (Thu, 17 Mar 94 04:32:29 PST) - No Subject - Ed Switalski <E.Switalski@bnr.co.uk>