1994-03-29 - Re: cfp ‘94 transcript

Header Data

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: Jack King <gjk@well.sf.ca.us>
Message Hash: a1e0cee98e166861bb8599e0b32a1d9529861ea057be7386480b516e0f5f3a11
Message ID: <Pine.3.05.9403291059.A8029-a100000@panix.com>
Reply To: <199403291352.FAA10544@well.sf.ca.us>
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-29 15:36:22 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 29 Mar 94 07:36:22 PST

Raw message

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 94 07:36:22 PST
To: Jack King <gjk@well.sf.ca.us>
Subject: Re: cfp '94 transcript
In-Reply-To: <199403291352.FAA10544@well.sf.ca.us>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.05.9403291059.A8029-a100000@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




On Tue, 29 Mar 1994, Jack King wrote:

> Mike Godwin stated that the FBI agent said something like "
> "we can lie to you, but you can't lie to us."  That has always been true
> under 18 U.S.C. 1001.  But now you can't even answer one of their questions
> with a "no" if the truthful answer would be "yes."  You should read up on
> this, it's scarier than Clipper and the digital telephony proposal combined.

Of course you can still refuse to say anything which is what you should
have always done in any case.  

I wonder that if you tell the agents that you reserve the right to lie --
in other words disclaim an oath.  Swear to lie.  If you can beat such a rap.

DCF







Thread