1994-03-05 - Re: Standard for SteGAnography

Header Data

From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu>
To: cypherpunks list <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: b09c1a852a1e117a545f3e5612b9bb28e6a18ddf52c9a8e8fa4c3731af271cf1
Message ID: <9403050751.AA13101@toad.com>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9403050138.E28008-0100000@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-05 07:51:28 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 4 Mar 94 23:51:28 PST

Raw message

From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 94 23:51:28 PST
To: cypherpunks list <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Standard for SteGAnography
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9403050138.E28008-0100000@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
Message-ID: <9403050751.AA13101@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> know = 100% objective certainty

Well, OTP gives you this.  Probabilistic encryption does too, I
think (the original version -- not the practical version).  Quantum
cryptography is pretty close, depending on how much trust you place
in the laws of physics.  Granted, none of these are very useful.

The question is, 100% objective certainty of *what*?  If breaking a
scheme were provably exponential-time, that'd be enough for me.

> Sergey

   Eli   ebrandt@hmc.edu

Thread

• Return to March 1994

• Return to “Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu>”
• Return to “m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)”
• Return to “Sergey Goldgaber <sergey@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>”
• Return to “SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>”

• Return to “wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)”

• 1994-03-04 (Thu, 3 Mar 94 17:34:46 PST) - Re: Standard for Stenography? - wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)
  • 1994-03-04 (Thu, 3 Mar 94 19:01:22 PST) - Re: Standard for Stenography? - Sergey Goldgaber <sergey@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
  • 1994-03-04 (Fri, 4 Mar 94 06:57:08 PST) - Re: Standard for Stenography? - m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
    • 1994-03-05 (Fri, 4 Mar 94 22:22:00 PST) - Re: Standard for Stenography? - Sergey Goldgaber <sergey@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
      • 1994-03-05 (Fri, 4 Mar 94 23:51:28 PST) - Re: Standard for SteGAnography - Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu>
        • 1994-03-05 (Sat, 5 Mar 94 00:22:13 PST) - Re: Standard for SteGAnography - Sergey Goldgaber <sergey@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
          • 1994-03-05 (Sat, 5 Mar 94 00:59:38 PST) - Re: Standard for SteGAnography - Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu>
            • 1994-03-07 (Mon, 7 Mar 94 00:41:15 PST) - Re: Standard for SteGAnography - Sergey Goldgaber <sergey@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
              • 1994-03-07 (Mon, 7 Mar 94 01:03:20 PST) - Re: Standard for SteGAnography - Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu>
        • 1994-03-06 (Sun, 6 Mar 94 07:18:13 PST) - Re: Standard for SteGAnography - SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>