From: jsday@THUNDER.LakeheadU.CA (Jer!)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d5135d467b1ec21e7bd74f30fc959bcffb6dab74985def6e8c4a23ddb0d631bd
Message ID: <9403242319.AA15128@thunder.LakeheadU.Ca>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-24 23:19:55 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 24 Mar 94 15:19:55 PST
From: jsday@THUNDER.LakeheadU.CA (Jer!)
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 94 15:19:55 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Digital Cash
Message-ID: <9403242319.AA15128@thunder.LakeheadU.Ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mike Duvos <mpd@netcom.com> wrote:
> Assuming the transactions are done via a tamperproof module
> distributed by the issuer, and the math is arranged such that
> using a note in multiple transactions reveals the perpetrator,
> the system prevents anonymous double-spending while still
> providing all the benefits of digital cash.
How does the 'tamperproof' nature of the software help at all?
It's still possible to double-spend in any off-line cash system
by making multiple copies of the tamper-proof modules.. the only
security provided is in obscuring the algorithm.
Speaking of digital cash, many thanks to the author of the
'magic money' software. I am in the process of integrating it
with a local bulletin board, which should hopefully be available
on the net sometime this summer.
:::*::: Jeremy S. Day.
Return to March 1994
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”