1994-03-26 - Re: Digital Cash
Header Data
From: sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us (Bill Sommerfeld)
To: hfinney@shell.portal.com
Message Hash: e45755db80f153cfbcaf0e6b83d1717005e4e26651d095146fd5cd7219c7e4a4
Message ID: <199403260412.XAA00321@orchard.medford.ma.us>
Reply To: <199403251556.HAA22964@jobe.shell.portal.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-26 03:45:03 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 25 Mar 94 19:45:03 PST
Raw message
From: sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us (Bill Sommerfeld)
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 94 19:45:03 PST
To: hfinney@shell.portal.com
Subject: Re: Digital Cash
In-Reply-To: <199403251556.HAA22964@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Message-ID: <199403260412.XAA00321@orchard.medford.ma.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I have always been skeptical of this observer-chip approach, because it
wasn't clear that it was feasible to make a tamper-resistant chip
economically, and because the specialized hardware that would be
required would prevent the system from being used on widely-available
PCs.
Think "PCMCIA" here.. not just laptops, but now desktop systems and
palmtop systems are starting to get PCMCIA slots these days.
- Bill
Thread
Return to March 1994
- Return to “Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>”
- Return to “sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us (Bill Sommerfeld)”
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”
- 1994-03-25 (Fri, 25 Mar 94 07:44:27 PST) - Re: Digital Cash - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
- 1994-03-26 (Fri, 25 Mar 94 19:45:03 PST) - Re: Digital Cash - sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us (Bill Sommerfeld)
- 1994-03-26 (Fri, 25 Mar 94 20:30:27 PST) - Re: Digital Cash - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
- 1994-03-26 (Fri, 25 Mar 94 19:45:03 PST) - Re: Digital Cash - sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us (Bill Sommerfeld)