1994-03-06 - Re: Update on user-level hack to do telnet encryption posted recently

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
To: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Message Hash: f0e1333651daa604dc9d7fff143b5762e1cfceae2b674b2aacda1f21540a0437
Message ID: <9403061526.AA17058@andria.lehman.com>
Reply To: <199403061234.MAA27780@an-teallach.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-06 15:26:47 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 6 Mar 94 07:26:47 PST

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 94 07:26:47 PST
To: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Subject: Re: Update on user-level hack to do telnet encryption posted recently
In-Reply-To: <199403061234.MAA27780@an-teallach.com>
Message-ID: <9403061526.AA17058@andria.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Graham Toal says:
> Perry, I *already* have the bsd4.4 Kerberized telnet with DES that comes with
> the BSDI distribution (original code in the US, a re-implementation on
> supplementary floppies in the UK)

Not the same program at all. Why don't you actually read some of the
RFCs instead of making yourself look foolish?

> Not *one* of the dozen odd sites I telnet to is running it.

Have you asked them to run it? Have you considered simply running the
daemon yourself on another port instead of implementing some crude
hack?

Perry





Thread