1994-04-25 - Re: The un-BBS

Header Data

From: “Phil G. Fraering” <pgf@srl.cacs.usl.edu>
To: evidence@netcom.com
Message Hash: 01d45738190eb920f8b0c7ac069b567c6a9cc9807a1dce9a282372cd11368f1f
Message ID: <199404252219.AA04044@srl03.cacs.usl.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-25 22:32:53 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 25 Apr 94 15:32:53 PDT

Raw message

From: "Phil G. Fraering" <pgf@srl.cacs.usl.edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 94 15:32:53 PDT
To: evidence@netcom.com
Subject: Re: The un-BBS
Message-ID: <199404252219.AA04044@srl03.cacs.usl.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Evidence, how did the cases the FCC brought turn out?

If the network had used commercial radio licenses, how much more
would it have cost them (per node; I have a vague idea of the
size and power of a random Amateur Packet Radio node (in computer
terms and cost))?

Would this have given them greater immunity in prosecution?

(Hmm.. if you're passing it on, you're broadcasting it? Could
encryption tech be used to "enhance" APRN to give sysops "plausible
deniability?"

Phil

Thread

• Return to April 1994

• Return to ““Evidence Inc.” <evidence@netcom.com>”
• Return to ““Jim Sewell” <jims@Central.KeyWest.MPGN.COM>”
• Return to ““Phil G. Fraering” <pgf@srl.cacs.usl.edu>”

• Return to “Rolf Michelsen <Rolf.Michelsen@delab.sintef.no>”

• 1994-04-25 (Mon, 25 Apr 94 15:32:53 PDT) - Re: The un-BBS - “Phil G. Fraering” <pgf@srl.cacs.usl.edu>
  • 1994-04-27 (Tue, 26 Apr 94 19:53:14 PDT) - Re: The un-BBS - “Evidence Inc.” <evidence@netcom.com>
    • 1994-04-27 (Wed, 27 Apr 94 06:50:05 PDT) - Re: The un-BBS - “Jim Sewell” <jims@Central.KeyWest.MPGN.COM>
      • 1994-04-27 (Wed, 27 Apr 94 07:16:38 PDT) - Re: The un-BBS - “Jim Sewell” <jims@Central.KeyWest.MPGN.COM>
      • 1994-04-27 (Wed, 27 Apr 94 07:20:49 PDT) - Re: The un-BBS - Rolf Michelsen <Rolf.Michelsen@delab.sintef.no>