1994-04-20 - Re: Remailer Musings

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@snark.imsi.com>
To: juola@bruno.cs.colorado.edu
Message Hash: 02df7ddf2dd749e3944d29155d3db70b712c76ea7d01d8d799f7b5d2e28c3aca
Message ID: <9404201610.AA08273@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <199404201559.JAA08006@bruno.cs.colorado.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-20 16:10:34 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Apr 94 09:10:34 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@snark.imsi.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 94 09:10:34 PDT
To: juola@bruno.cs.colorado.edu
Subject: Re: Remailer Musings
In-Reply-To: <199404201559.JAA08006@bruno.cs.colorado.edu>
Message-ID: <9404201610.AA08273@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

juola@bruno.cs.colorado.edu says:
> If he's unable (read, unwilling by design) to help, then it's possible
> that a judge could find that he's not a common carrier and therefore liable.

Of course, the phone company is unable (read, unable by design) to
help every day -- ask them sometime who called you at 10pm last
Tuesday even WITH a court order some time.

> Of course, I'm not a lawyer myself.

As you yourself note, you aren't. Personally, I'd rather leave this to
folks like Mike Godwin who are.