1994-04-23 - Re: Encryption for OS/2

Header Data

From: Chris Knight <cknight@crl.com>
To: PMARKS@VAX1.UMKC.EDU
Message Hash: 1da79e9a9ee3d00ffc13a56f231eb32bd4fc77ae388f4d0f5309561d70660f99
Message ID: <Pine.3.87.9404231139.A25400-0100000@crl.crl.com>
Reply To: <01HBIGEQV5B690NIOI@VAX1.UMKC.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-23 18:59:45 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 23 Apr 94 11:59:45 PDT

Raw message

From: Chris Knight <cknight@crl.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 94 11:59:45 PDT
To: PMARKS@VAX1.UMKC.EDU
Subject: Re: Encryption for OS/2
In-Reply-To: <01HBIGEQV5B690NIOI@VAX1.UMKC.EDU>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9404231139.A25400-0100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




On Sat, 23 Apr 1994 PMARKS@VAX1.UMKC.EDU wrote:

> I would like to hear from CP's who have implemented PGP on OS/2.  I'm a
> little concerned that I can only encrypt FAT files when the bulk of my 
> data are on HPFS formatted drives.  Is there a group out there?
  
  Although I have not implemented PGP on my OS/2 drive yet, I don't see 
it as a problem.  I run many DOS/FAT apps on my system that work well 
under HPFS.  After all, you are just issuing a file open command, and 
then a series of reads, nothing the system can't handle.

  The only place I see a problem is with file names.  If you haven't 
modified the source, and compiled it will a decent OS/2 compiler, then it 
will only work with 8.3 names.

  Good luck.  Let me know if you have any problems.  In the mean time, 
I'll be installing it here.

-ck






Thread