From: kafka@desert.hacktic.nl (Patrick Oonk)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 21dc5b1a3de2148ecb524f4571cd6f7aaf191a75b864de42fabaa0b3767e7bfc
Message ID: <199404052330.AA02521@xs4all.hacktic.nl>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-05 23:31:50 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 5 Apr 94 16:31:50 PDT
From: kafka@desert.hacktic.nl (Patrick Oonk)
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 94 16:31:50 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PHILIP ZIMMERMAN ARRESTED [NOT!]
Message-ID: <199404052330.AA02521@xs4all.hacktic.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In article <m0pneHy-0001W9C@ideath>, you write the following:
GR> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
GR>
GR>
GR> > The Zimmerman prank---I'm sure not funny for him---hardens my line
GR> > further against anonymity online. At its best, as here, it is an
GR> > unholy nuisance.
GR>
GR> Interesting. The recent thread on alt.security re someone who mentioned
GR> thoughts of suicide on Usenet and was held for 48 hours' psychiatric
GR> evaluation hardens my line in favor of anonymity online.
GR>
[stuff deleted]
GR>
GR> How will we stop folks from setting up accounts with names other than
GR> their "real names" .. or from stealing others' accounts .. or from
GR> forging mail? A $1000 PC can run Linux and SLIP and look to the rest of
GR> the net like any other IP-connected site; how will we enforce our rules
GR> on those systems?
You can run slip on a $200 vintage IBM-AT.
Patrick :)
---
"In a Time/CNN poll of 1,000 Americans conducted last week by Yankelovich
Partners, two-thirds said it was more important to protect the privacy of
phone calls than to preserve the ability of police to conduct wiretaps.
When informed about the Clipper Chip, 80% said they opposed it."
- Philip Elmer-Dewitt, "Who Should Keep the Keys", TIME, Mar. 4 1994
== To get PGP, FTP /pub/unix/security/crypt/pgp23A.zip from ftp.funet.fi ==
Return to April 1994
Return to “kafka@desert.hacktic.nl (Patrick Oonk)”
1994-04-05 (Tue, 5 Apr 94 16:31:50 PDT) - Re: PHILIP ZIMMERMAN ARRESTED [NOT!] - kafka@desert.hacktic.nl (Patrick Oonk)