From: greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3b20b51ee2bf7f04d030c416a5ac15330fd15c1eec8c8c8c75bd9eb64ddd4cbc
Message ID: <m0pnEdX-0001a4C@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-02 22:58:15 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 2 Apr 94 14:58:15 PST
From: greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 94 14:58:15 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Politics do not belong here
Message-ID: <m0pnEdX-0001a4C@ideath.goldenbear.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Jeremiah Blatz writes:
> I may very well be completly wrong here, but IMO there is no place for
> politics on this list. Cryptography, by its very nature, is an
> anti-political thing.
I disagree here - politics is what makes Cypherpunks different from
a sci.crypt mailing list. As Eric Hughes points out, cryptography is
economics - and politics is economics with the gloves off. Crypto is
inherently political. ("political" doesn't have to mean liberals - v. -
conservatives.)
> All politicians who try in increase the power of
> government are against the cypherpunk agenda of increasing the use of
> encryption, it doesn't matter what party they belong to.
Be careful the way you use the word "agenda", you're gonna get Detweiler
all worked up again. I don't think there is one agenda shared by all
list subscribers. As I see it, "cypherpunks" follows the Earth First!
model of (dis/anti) organization - there are no leaders, there is no
"policy", there is no voting, there is no platform. There are folks who
do what they choose to do, and putting a name on it makes it easier to
talk about. Myself, I'm not so wound up about getting everyone on the
planet to use crypto as I am interested in making sure we all can if we
want/need to; and that's mostly useful insofar as it more clearly
delineates a boundary to the power/ability of the state.
> This discussion
> is simply a bunch of messages that bait people with different political
> alignments than the sender's, please take it elsewhere.
I do agree that baiting and flaming are useless. The list is interesting
because it's where folks with different interests/talents/orientations
intersect, not where we diverge. Our differences and disagreements are
significant but they can also distract us from shared goals.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
iQCVAgUBLZ34an3YhjZY3fMNAQF9xQQAgAJp7WXDmZre7mKMQpNZUOGQsc/bMTlw
BD7xtXO12cbpIh4bgCt2N9ekogCBwrC9+y8ll0rL/rJ9UyuCkpgurrTElSROot8R
umN+l5ENRiZKG3VeAE+FbbYIzQfMV4FBN1VaOQsRldMBPwbA0pRgJ8BsjFvSC//R
lWf2xtUtkCc=
=DYQ+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to April 1994
Return to “greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)”
1994-04-02 (Sat, 2 Apr 94 14:58:15 PST) - Re: Politics do not belong here - greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)