1994-04-28 - Anonymous remailer for Waffle
Header Data
From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: kafka@desert.hacktic.nl
Message Hash: 3c06242475293d3db9ee2b9745e6fc304e060a87a4843911418df0776ee88a39
Message ID: <9404281532.AA19806@ah.com>
Reply To: <s0yeLc1w165w@desert.hacktic.nl>
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-28 15:37:34 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 28 Apr 94 08:37:34 PDT
Raw message
From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 94 08:37:34 PDT
To: kafka@desert.hacktic.nl
Subject: Anonymous remailer for Waffle
In-Reply-To: <s0yeLc1w165w@desert.hacktic.nl>
Message-ID: <9404281532.AA19806@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>To make it possible to reply, I think the following approach
>will do: the 'reply-to:' address will be
> "<anon@some.system.org> (NickName Anon-ID=XXXXXX)"
Reply addresses in address comments (the parentheses) don't work
reliably. They're comments--various mailers do odd things with them,
like drop them. The question is reliability not function, because it
will work a lot of the time.
Eric
Thread
Return to April 1994
- Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
Return to “kafka@desert.hacktic.nl (Kafka)”
- 1994-04-28 (Wed, 27 Apr 94 17:17:40 PDT) - Anonymous remailer for Waffle - kafka@desert.hacktic.nl (Kafka)
- 1994-04-28 (Thu, 28 Apr 94 08:37:34 PDT) - Anonymous remailer for Waffle - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)