1994-04-30 - Different remailer software

Header Data

From: Urban Nilsson <d7urban@dtek.chalmers.se>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 411e5971d26956737da5203b5610ad874ea4412b7cb3e39eeea7445c0b1b2bc8
Message ID: <199404300621.IAA18083@hacket.dtek.chalmers.se>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-30 06:20:58 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 29 Apr 94 23:20:58 PDT

Raw message

From: Urban Nilsson <d7urban@dtek.chalmers.se>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 94 23:20:58 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Different remailer software
Message-ID: <199404300621.IAA18083@hacket.dtek.chalmers.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I've just taken a quick look at soda.berkeley.edu's remailers.
There's several of them, and if I'm now to install one of them,
what are their strengths/weaknesses? Should I choose hal's
remailer? Or maybe Nate's? Or hh-remailer? Sameer's anon-
remailer? The INDEX file doesn't say anything about what
differs one remailer from the next, just who wrote it...
Help me out, please!

Urban Nilsson                     | Use 'finger' for PGP2.3a public key.
d7urban@dtek.chalmers.se          |-------------------------------------
Chalmers University of Technology |A person is just as big as the things
Gothenburg, Sweden                |that makes him angry.





Thread