1994-04-25 - Re: THE FREEDOM DAEMON - PART DOUX

Header Data

From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 495654a870cac11839cbbafae828071fe174c3b8fd3b932dc839435e88e4493d
Message ID: <9404251651.AA22530@anchor.ho.att.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-25 17:31:09 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 25 Apr 94 10:31:09 PDT

Raw message

From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 94 10:31:09 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re:  THE FREEDOM DAEMON - PART DOUX
Message-ID: <9404251651.AA22530@anchor.ho.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Gary Jeffers writes: 
> There has been some criticism of the ethics of my THE FREEDOM DAEMON post.
> The freedom daemon is a proposed software machine for a proposed
> future in which a police state captures the Internet. 

It did look a lot like fiction rather than a plan for real code.
But parts of it didn't look like good ideas.

> Under a police state & in times of strife, ethics change & 
> things that were at one time unthinkable become quite thinkable.

Ethics don't change - some people just make different decisions about
whether to apply them or not.  Sometimes the applications are different,
if your ethics tell you to treat bad guys differently from good guys
and other people have changed sides.

> However, this speculation was just a flight of fancy, so go back to 
> sleep & don't worry your precious little heads.
Same to you, bud :-)

			Bill Stewart
			





Thread