From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@snark.imsi.com>
To: jamiel@sybase.com (Jamie Lawrence)
Message Hash: 58fb99527f99378acec8499127988dc040714c407a5ee2249b10bd7b1a99e5d8
Message ID: <9404221801.AA01603@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <9404221742.AA02556@ralph.sybgate.sybase.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-22 18:02:34 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 22 Apr 94 11:02:34 PDT
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@snark.imsi.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 94 11:02:34 PDT
To: jamiel@sybase.com (Jamie Lawrence)
Subject: Re: cryptophone ideas
In-Reply-To: <9404221742.AA02556@ralph.sybgate.sybase.com>
Message-ID: <9404221801.AA01603@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Jamie Lawrence says:
> I am not sure if I am not explaining myself clearly or if you are being
> intentionally dense.
>
> The point is that if we know our stuff, have way too much liesure time and
> are dedicated to difficult solutions, my cellular and your cellular could
> be hacked to make use of the DSP as a co/dec for what ever we wish
> it to.
Analog cellphones do not have real DSP in them. They are ANALOG you
see. The digital cellphones can't be encrypted without cooperation of
the base station.
Perry
Return to April 1994
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@snark.imsi.com>”