1994-04-12 - Re: alias in phone book

Header Data

From: dmandl@lehman.com (David Mandl)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5d07e7b2659e63c2b10afc7af484f2a4f74182c7160d82020a194628e0c95fe7
Message ID: <9404121954.AA03498@disvnm2.lehman.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-12 20:19:58 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 12 Apr 94 13:19:58 PDT

Raw message

From: dmandl@lehman.com (David Mandl)
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 94 13:19:58 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: alias in phone book
Message-ID: <9404121954.AA03498@disvnm2.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
> 
> >A professor of communications has brought up the fact that it is illegal 
> >to use a pseudo in the white pages of the phone book.  Is this the case?
> 
> I would suggest first, to ask this professor to make a legal citation,
> and if one is not forthcoming, to ask for a retraction of the claim.
> 
> Eric

It's definitely false, at least here in NYC.  A well-known alternative
to having an unlisted phone number (a privilege that the phone company
charges extra for, the crooks) is to have your phone listed under a
different name.  So, if I'm listed in the phone book as "Nick Drake,"
I'm still listed, and so I don't get charged for being unlisted.  However,
anyone looking for D. Mandl in the phone book won't find me, so I'm
_effectively_ unlisted.  Strange but true.

   --Dave.





Thread