1994-04-04 - Re: Cyberspace, Crypto Anarchy, and Pushing Limits

Header Data

From: Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: 6792d29032d498c35c9814982db22bf4f1c6cdca49d98230969f713fb9868fb9
Message ID: <199404040325.UAA11843@soda.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <199404040216.TAA09304@mail.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-04 03:26:04 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Apr 94 20:26:04 PDT

Raw message

From: Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 94 20:26:04 PDT
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: Cyberspace, Crypto Anarchy, and Pushing Limits
In-Reply-To: <199404040216.TAA09304@mail.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199404040325.UAA11843@soda.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


> 
> - a general move away from "commons"-oriented systems, which breed the
> notions of "fair access" and such. If the "problem" is that poor
> people cannot--it is alleged--afford a $17 a month Net connection
> (what Netcom charges, in about 25 cities and growing), then my
> solution would be to simply _subsidize_ their bill. (I'm not
> advocating this, nor do I think it wise to subsidize anyone's phone,
> Net, or dinner bills, but better this than "nationalizing" networks
> and thus creating more confusion and less efficiency for all.)
> 

	We don't need subsidized bills for cheaper access.
	Just cheaper access. It'll happen. Market pressure + all that.





Thread