From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 67d60c7074bd068257daaeee99d8dc06f7ba41f226a120cd489d5f27cb34c4c4
Message ID: <9404170408.AA28860@ah.com>
Reply To: <9404151416.AA27651@media.mit.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-17 04:16:56 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Apr 94 21:16:56 PDT
From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 94 21:16:56 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: 'Nother MIT talk on crypto...
In-Reply-To: <9404151416.AA27651@media.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <9404170408.AA28860@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>> ``WHICH KEY ESCROW, IF ANY?''
>> or
>> ``Fair Cryptosystems vs. The Clipper Chip''
>> by
>> Silvio Micali
Micali's "fair" cryptosystem is a much better key surrender system
than Clipper, but it still allows non-intended recipients for a
message.
For this reason, I don't like it either.
Fight _all_ intrusions.
Eric
Return to April 1994
Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”