1994-04-19 - Re: cryptophone ideas
Header Data
From: “Phil G. Fraering” <pgf@srl.cacs.usl.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 722d0e7dddcbea3fbf0042210c61498818a1e42f6e08eaf56dd940eefe7fc3a1
Message ID: <199404192239.AA17456@srl03.cacs.usl.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-19 22:43:48 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 19 Apr 94 15:43:48 PDT
Raw message
From: "Phil G. Fraering" <pgf@srl.cacs.usl.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 94 15:43:48 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: cryptophone ideas
Message-ID: <199404192239.AA17456@srl03.cacs.usl.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Lady Ada writes:
>The ideal phone might be based on CPU's, RAM, and DSP's, with no
>DES chips or anything like that.
Have you seen the prices of used original NeXT equipment lately,
or just the prices of single system boards from back in the 68030
era?
Anyway, why do you need a DSP? I have read in several places that
DSP's are going to be "replaced" by the CPU as time goes on and the
CPUs just get more and more powerful.
Phil
Thread
Return to April 1994
- Return to “Eric Blossom <eb@sr.hp.com>”
- Return to ““Phil G. Fraering” <pgf@srl.cacs.usl.edu>”
- Return to “Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>”
- Return to “sdw@meaddata.com (Stephen Williams)”
Return to “uri@watson.ibm.com”
- 1994-04-19 (Tue, 19 Apr 94 15:43:48 PDT) - Re: cryptophone ideas - “Phil G. Fraering” <pgf@srl.cacs.usl.edu>
- 1994-04-19 (Tue, 19 Apr 94 16:24:06 PDT) - Re: cryptophone ideas - sdw@meaddata.com (Stephen Williams)
- 1994-04-20 (Wed, 20 Apr 94 10:34:35 PDT) - Re: cryptophone ideas - uri@watson.ibm.com
- 1994-04-20 (Wed, 20 Apr 94 14:56:54 PDT) - cryptophone ideas - Eric Blossom <eb@sr.hp.com>
- 1994-04-21 (Thu, 21 Apr 94 16:07:24 PDT) - Re: cryptophone ideas - Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>