From: David Merriman <merriman@metronet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7d0bbe2b1446507734eb7f505cb04c3189b6841db3f4bffe1b58ddd35a41f0a4
Message ID: <199404261329.AA25100@metronet.com>
Reply To: <9404252223.AA13361@bilbo.suite.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-26 13:29:39 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 26 Apr 94 06:29:39 PDT
From: David Merriman <merriman@metronet.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 94 06:29:39 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: message splitting for better mixing?
In-Reply-To: <9404252223.AA13361@bilbo.suite.com>
Message-ID: <199404261329.AA25100@metronet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Jim Miller
>
> The idea:
>
> 1) write sender-side code to split message into N parts and send each
> part through a different remailer chain.
>
> 2) decrypt the parts as they arrive as per normal encrypted remailer
> messages.
>
> 3) write receiver-side code to detect "a part" and stuff it in a file
> until the remaining related parts arrive. When all related parts
> have arrived, present the complete message to receiver.
>
>
> Why? To increase the number of "messages" flowing through the
> remailers to make traffic analysis more difficult.
>
Would seem to be a mild nuisance to implement, but probably be quite
effective - particularly if the pieces were 'masked' as uuencoded chunks
of, say, a .GIF or something :-)
Dave Merriman
Return to April 1994
Return to “jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)”