1994-04-05 - In the latest IEEE Spectrum

Header Data

From: Matt Thomlinson <phantom@u.washington.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8e2b54151929cb7302dc4bbca2391ccdbc161bc67ac88a77b02ef4fc88840d0f
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9404041733.A13150-0100000@stein1.u.washington.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-05 00:35:30 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 4 Apr 94 17:35:30 PDT

Raw message

From: Matt Thomlinson <phantom@u.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 94 17:35:30 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: In the latest IEEE Spectrum
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9404041733.A13150-0100000@stein1.u.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


For personal use only -- posted without permission


"Classified algorithm for encryption"
IEEE Spectrum, April 1994. 


Federal policy makers should reconsider the Clipper/Skipjack cryptography 
scheme, which employs a classified algorithm and Government-held keys as 
the basis of a new encryption standard, according to a six-page statement 
by IEEE-United States Activities. "Federal cryptography policy should not 
fight technological progress by attempting to retain outdated techniques 
of surveillance at the cost of the reliability and the security of the 
American information infrastructure," the statement concluded.

The reasons given for issuing the statement included IEEE-USA's concerns 
that classified algorithms "cannot be proven secure," that individuals 
seeking to avoid detection would simply choose another cryptography 
method that can be downloaded from the Internet, and that law enforcement 
agencies can use other new methods--from vibration-sensing lasers on 
windows to keyboard-trapping programs. For more information, contact 
IEEE-USA at (202)785-0017.


mt

Matt Thomlinson                               
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.      phone: (206) 548-9804
Check my home page -- ftp://ftp.u.washington.edu/public/phantom/home.html 
PGP 2.2 key available via email, or finger phantom@hardy.u.washington.edu






Thread