From: Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: 979894325033574d90af78270671bb5dbac1906598fd10274a27b8c19f716d19
Message ID: <m0pvJ3Q-000157C@infinity.hip.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <199404240936.CAA28994@mail.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-25 05:16:36 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 24 Apr 94 22:16:36 PDT
From: Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 94 22:16:36 PDT
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: The un-BBS (minor corrections)
In-Reply-To: <199404240936.CAA28994@mail.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <m0pvJ3Q-000157C@infinity.hip.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Timothy C. May spake:
>
>
> Gad, I see I made several mistakes in one paragraph:
>
> > I support Mike's belief that some sort of Internet II is needed. It'll
> > be hard to duplicate the spectacular sense of the Internet, and almost
> > certainly happen because of "planning."
>
> A better version:
>
> I support Mike Ingle's belief that some sort of Internet II is needed.
> It'll be hard to duplicate the spectacular *succeess* of the Internet,
> and almost *not* certainly happen because of "planning."
>
>
One of my dreams is to be running/a-part-of my own
backbone.. but not a backbone in the current hierarchal organization,
but more of a web. . . each site connected to about 3-4 other sites
(relatively local.. maybe in neighboring regions of the country) with
highspeed links, and decentralized..
The net may be decentralized, but not decentralized enough.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
iQCVAgUBLbtSbHi7eNFdXppdAQFKwgP/UWkK8eaeY4IudsG/IDr6BfpOUoN6w/5z
hzcWea6ro/rUowZDhrn2/npoai4MJqsiiwT6ZX7Ibz3I2UJP5gYgT6qjLa6dpBBf
0XtCZEBSK/Qi+RMU0iUyK7Yu23LZlSA5wLZ1ZPboZhC530+d8Yg+O7MUb1+0ZaDF
ddOmEwBBRt4=
=ltT8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to April 1994
Return to “Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>”
Unknown thread root