1994-04-03 - Detweilering (was Re: Positive uses for PGP)

Header Data

From: jkreznar@ininx.com (John E. Kreznar)
To: hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu
Message Hash: 97e65bf88392dfedaf9fd3a2d0143bbdb6a9eedc210c784f8a1822f23eb1088b
Message ID: <9404032227.AA06153@ininx>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9404031126.A27596-0100000@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-03 22:27:34 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Apr 94 15:27:34 PDT

Raw message

From: jkreznar@ininx.com (John E. Kreznar)
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 94 15:27:34 PDT
To: hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu
Subject: Detweilering (was Re: Positive uses for PGP)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9404031126.A27596-0100000@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
Message-ID: <9404032227.AA06153@ininx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> On Sun, 3 Apr 1994, Mike McNally wrote:

> > I'm not Detweilering; I speak of the ostensible use of the signature
> > chain.)

> Detweilering?

> Sounds like an entry we need to get put into future versions of a Jargon 
> File.

Maybe it could be added to the FAQ.  You know, the one Detweiler wrote.

(:-)

	John E. Kreznar		| Relations among people to be by
	jkreznar@ininx.com	| mutual consent, or not at all.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLZ9COcDhz44ugybJAQH9OQP/TjJukjUH+PYP87Ims5OonokOlMVCSX8f
QekhHf4XPSgODPJltFM6Z7QnjOwgRwUwD5TxwkPlAcol2c11/OtHIwFhei3jsATW
H66KaQFr3LtGWMsdwEFTApRScr4CFSskzwsqMp1hXJRIZRNuy1qVKRBgufwd13sF
qJtfwd9278Q=
=NcUs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread