From: greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 94 00:48:28 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Pseudonyms and Reputations
Message-ID: <m0ppAS3-0001YsC@ideath.goldenbear.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


Hal Finney writes:

> The simple blinded signature model provides a pretty simple way to allow
> only one pseudonym per True Name in a given forum, if you assume there is
> some way to distinguish people in the real world.  Suppose Cypherwonks
> wanted only one person per nym.  And suppose there was an agency which
> was able to distinguish people, that is, it could tell when it had seen the
> same person twice.  Now, Cypherwonks asks this agency to give a single
> blinded signature of a type (exponent) which is unique to that list, to
> anyone who wants it, but such that nobody gets more than one.

> To be accepted on the Cypherwonks list, then, somebody would have to show
> a signature of this particular type, different from everyone else's.  Each
> person could only get one such token, which Chaum has called an is-a-person
> credential (again, this is a simplification of his idea, I think).

Real-world application of this protocol still depends on folks not
using the credentials of friends/family/dead people, especially where
"real name" <-> credential mapping isn't available.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLaT/gH3YhjZY3fMNAQFIjwQArXybGzGZnHUugI6mcOn8CwhamKC9KxK7
LmWo0lzEsrK8Iq4n17JB9fLKb8Cb3UYYinvBk1Fadr9OcAOANC1bqjDoJ3Dsvyz3
9/AFY8CfiaH9JqhRK1jAMdg2kuAFdtFBENhhXE9f6v6sedeQvclfwea1u5vMaErJ
0aq5KRAQKH4=
=MFNH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----