From: “Jim Sewell - KD4CKQ” <jims@Central.KeyWest.MPGN.COM>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c378ead102e7e1163036f40a154db35ae93b9780c5359dd675ae162d8f5e134d
Message ID: <9404181430.AA22279@Central.KeyWest.MPGN.COM>
Reply To: <940417163514.20221886@SCSUD.CTSTATEU.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-18 14:30:44 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 18 Apr 94 07:30:44 PDT
From: "Jim Sewell - KD4CKQ" <jims@Central.KeyWest.MPGN.COM>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 94 07:30:44 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Warrantless searches -- A sign of things to come?
In-Reply-To: <940417163514.20221886@SCSUD.CTSTATEU.EDU>
Message-ID: <9404181430.AA22279@Central.KeyWest.MPGN.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Slightly reformatted, but the content is faithfully reproduced:
<My computer told me that GERSTEIN@SCSUD.CTSTATEU.EDU said:>
>
> On Sun, 17 Apr 94 13:39:39
> paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
>
> >A Page 1 story in The Washington Post Sunday (94.04.17) reads,
... [warrantless searches of housing project] ...
> Anyway, the point is, these people aren't safe in their own homes.
Then the cops need to sting/watch these guys until they catch them
committing these felonies and throw them in jail, not invade the
privacy of a citizen cuz they think it's right. If the cops were
watching that neighborhood then the child couldn't have been sniped
without the shooter getting bagged. It is a poorly chosen solution to
the police force's inability to do their job well due to fear and/or
underfunding.
> Slightly related is the fact that I live on my school's campus in the
> residence halls. If the resident advisors feel there is probable cause for
> something and decides to do a room search, I can do nothing about it
...
> BUT NO WARRANT WAS SERVED! Does that mean I can get the ACLU up the school's
> ass? If the school says they can do that because I pay to live on their
> property, then why can't the CHA do what they want?
Ah, but you see, you moved into the dorm (and signed a paper) saying you
would follow the school's rules. These rules included uncool search and
seizure and are allowed since you are not in a home... it's similar to a
hotel's right to do room service when you're out at the pool.
The people of CHA didn't forfeit the right to being secure in their homes.
(Apartments count as a home) They moved in with no such waivers. Therefore
they are afforded the same rights as a person with a house or living in an
apartment owned by, say you. They may fall under tenant / landlord laws,
but they are very protective of the tenant. EX: Unless there is imminent
damage to the place (broken water pipe or such) then the landlord must give
2 days notice to do an inspection or pest control or whatever he thinks he
needs in there for.
Take care
Jim
--
Tantalus Inc. Bringing people together Jim Sewell-KD4CKQ
2407 N. Roosevelt Blvd. to have a little fun. Internet: jims@mpgn.com
Key West, FL 33041 CIS: 71061,1027
(305) 293-8100 "We keep coding and coding and coding..."
Return to April 1994
Return to “Llywelyn <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>”