From: Dave Banisar <banisar@washofc.cpsr.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c8d603b23bd69dfb02c223d3014656c29ec6de41c5b2522490462ee504e9c5c1
Message ID: <9404131054.AA26806@Hacker2.cpsr.digex.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-13 14:53:45 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 13 Apr 94 07:53:45 PDT
From: Dave Banisar <banisar@washofc.cpsr.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 94 07:53:45 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Clipper Chips in video descramblers
Message-ID: <9404131054.AA26806@Hacker2.cpsr.digex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
There was also a recent news item that they were being investigated
for anti-trust actions. Sounds like a pretty good incentive to me....
-dave
> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 1994 14:51:19 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Joe Thomas <jthomas>
> Subject: Re: Clipper Chips in video descramblers
> To: David Koontz <koontzd@lrcs.loral.com>
> Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
> In-Reply-To: <9404121822.AA28517@io.lrcs.loral.com>
> Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9404121422.A8147-0100000@access1.digex.net> Mime-
> Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
> Precedence: bulk
>
> On Tue, 12 Apr 1994, David Koontz wrote:
>
> > Recently someone posted reference to GI (General Instruments) getting
> > authority to use Clipper chips in descramblers. One wonders about
> > motivation on their part.
>
> Maybe they were "suitably incentivized..."
>
> Joe
>
Return to April 1994
Return to “Dave Banisar <banisar@washofc.cpsr.org>”
1994-04-13 (Wed, 13 Apr 94 07:53:45 PDT) - Re: Clipper Chips in video descramblers - Dave Banisar <banisar@washofc.cpsr.org>