From: joshua geller <joshua@cae.retix.com>
To: mcable@Emerald.tufts.edu
Message Hash: cbfcc4b663107359fa24f04c8d8924270921ab226d1d4a51c1c16af74f66993f
Message ID: <199404261406.HAA03192@sleepy.retix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-26 14:07:01 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 26 Apr 94 07:07:01 PDT
From: joshua geller <joshua@cae.retix.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 94 07:07:01 PDT
To: mcable@Emerald.tufts.edu
Subject: Re: Internet Relay Chat
Message-ID: <199404261406.HAA03192@sleepy.retix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> On Mon, 25 Apr 1994 rishab@dxm.ernet.in wrote:
> > I've noticed some discussions of IRC (Internet Relay Chat), both as a possible
> > model for CP interactions, as well as a location for implementations of
> > BlackNet (in #wares, etc.)
> >
> > Note that IRC, unlike MUDS, has been designed to ensure 'true-names'. While
> > you do use nicknames, anyone can find out the machine name and user ID you are
> > logged in from, with a /whois. Anytime you join or leave a channel, your full
> > machine name and user ID is displayed to everyone, along with your nick. This
> > is different from any (possibly pseudonymous) e-mail address you register for
> > incoming mail.
>
> Fraid not....it's a trivial matter to fake the username, and if yer a
> smart cookie, faking the hostname is just as easy.
as far as I know, you have to hack the server to fake hostname.
historically this practice has been frowned upon by the majority
of IRC administrators.
but yes, faking username is trivial.
josh
Return to April 1994
Return to “joshua geller <joshua@cae.retix.com>”
1994-04-26 (Tue, 26 Apr 94 07:07:01 PDT) - Re: Internet Relay Chat - joshua geller <joshua@cae.retix.com>